The method used in my medical techno-thriller, A REMEDY FOR DEATH, depends on human stem cells from adult donors (Induced Pluripotent Cells—IPS cells) rather than tissue from aborted fetuses--a topic very much in the news recently because of a series of videos.
(Want to know more about Induced Pluripotent Cells? Here’s a link to a basic Wikipedia overview.)
In case the link doesn't work, here it is in open form: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_pluripotent_stem_cell
That said, an alternate research strand is very much in the news these days—fetal tissue research using organs from aborted fetuses.
Reasonable people can—and most definitely do, strongly—disagree on the medical ethics not only of abortion but also of “organ harvesting” from the resulting fetus. The fields of bio-engineering, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine are moving very fast, and medical ethicists are struggling to keep apace.
I expect you’ve heard about—and perhaps watched—the series of videos made by the Center for Medical Progress, an anti-abortion group recording interviews with Planned Parenthood staffers, as well as shots of the product of abortions induced in Planned Parenthood facilities.
In A REMEDY FOR DEATH, I raised different but related issues involving bio-engineering, organ harvesting and other issues--different because the plot-line does not involve aborted fetuses. But it does touch upon some of the same issues of medical ethics and biological research ethics as are raised by these videos and resulting discussions.
For an informative, balanced article on this issue of using aborted human fetal tissue in research, I suggest Sarah Kliff’s piece in VOX: "The Planned Parenthood controversy over aborted fetus body parts, explained"
That link repeated, in case it didn't come through: http://www.vox.com/2015/7/14/8964513/planned-parenthood-aborted-fetuses